Rethinking the Supreme Court’s Impact on American Federalism and Centralization

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract This article challenges the conventional wisdom about of Supreme Court’s impact on federalism and centralization. In particular, we argue that centralization Court is far less pronounced if decisions uphold federal state/local laws against challenge are classified as neutral rather than centralizing decentralizing, respectively. reclassification dramatically alters our understanding role in establishing federal–state boundaries power. After presenting theoretical arguments, briefly discuss potential empirical effects these revisions. Our analysis calls into question traditional picture a consistent force for It also during specific key periods American history.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Medical marijuana, American federalism, and the Supreme Court.

federal law enforcement authorities could criminally prosecute patients for possessing marijuana prescribed by a physician in accordance with state law. 1 The Court did not overturn state medical marijuana laws but did open the door to criminal prosecution under federal drug statutes. The Court also did not foreclose future challenges to federal enforcement on other constitutional grounds (eg, ...

متن کامل

the impact of generative learning strategy use on efl learners’ reading achievement and critical thinking

این پژوهش کوشیده است تأثیر به کارگیری راهبردهای زایا را بر پیشرفت و بسندگی در خواندن و درک مطلب و نیز بر تفکر انتقادی زبان آموزان انگلیسی را بررسی کند. در این پژوهش تعداد 46 دانش آموز دختر در مقطع متوسطه اول به صورت تصادفی انتخاب وبه دو گروه تجربی و شاهد با تعداد دانش آموزان مساوی در هر گروه تقسیم شدند. به هر دو گروه سه داستان کوتاه به عنوان موضوع خواندن برای کلاس داده شد. به گروه تجربی درابتدا...

Federalism and American Inequality

Studies of the political determinants of economic inequality have usually focused on the national government, but in federalist systems subnational governments may also be important. In recent decades, the U.S. national government has been less active in fighting inequality, but increasing devolution means that states wanting to address this problem have had a greater incentive and perhaps mean...

متن کامل

the geopolitics of afghanistan after september 11, 2001, and its impact on iranian national security

abstract u.s. attack to afghanistan after 9/11 provided opportunities for us who tried to become the dominant power after collapse of ussr and bipolar world. thinkers like fukuyama believed american liberal democrats thought would be universally accepted without resistances. liberal democracy is the best and final model of governance; in this regard, united state has moral responsibilities for...

15 صفحه اول

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Publius

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1747-7107', '0048-5950']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjac035